Policy Center in your inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Over the past half century, the level of Black residential segregation in metropolitan Washington declined steadily, decade by decade. The Black segregation index (see an explanation of it here) dropped from 81 (hyper-segregation) to 61 (the threshold of medium segregation).

Residential segregation of Hispanics in metropolitan Washington has followed a reverse trend. Hispanic/Anglo segregation index rose from 31 in 1980 to 48 in 2015.

During the 1960’s, when my Argentine wife Delcia and I first lived in D.C., the Washington region’s small Hispanic population (2.5 percent) revolved largely around international agencies and the diplomatic community. Returning to D.C. in 1991 after two decades in Albuquerque, New Mexico, we found the region’s Hispanic population transformed. Updated to 2015, the Hispanic population has increased eleven-fold, now accounting for 16.0 percent of the ten, closer-in jurisdictions that comprised the metro area when we had left in 1971.

And the profile is strikingly different. Metro Albuquerque’s Hispanic population dates back four centuries. In 2015, only 19 percent of adults were born abroad, as were less than 4 percent of children. By contrast, 72 percent of Metro Washington’s adults were born abroad and 11 percent of its children.

Countries of Origin

Where have all these newcomers come from? In 2015, of Metro Washington’s 875,260 Hispanics:

As I outlined in my previous article, Suburbia: the Promised Land?”, declining Black segregation was driven primarily by steady suburbanization of D.C.’s Black population (76 percent of the metro area’s total in 1970).

Relatively Even Distribution

But even in 1970, the region’s small Hispanic population was never concentrated in the central city; only 22 percent of the region’s Hispanics lived within DC then. And the massive, eleven-fold increases in the region’s Hispanic population have been pretty well scattered proportionally among the region’s core jurisdictions.

The distribution varied from 1.4 percent (Loudoun County and Fairfax City) of the jurisdictional population to 3.6 percent (Arlington County) around a region-wide 2.5 percent in 1970. In 2015, though the region-wide percentage of Hispanics had ballooned to 16.0 percent, it varied only from 9.7 percent (Falls Church City) to 21.5 percent (Prince William County). However, within these jurisdictions there has been a degree of clumping together of Hispanics in certain neighborhoods – hence, the increase in the Hispanic/Anglo segregation index from 31 in 1980 to 48 in 2015.

Such racial/ethnic concentration has never been as extreme for Hispanics as it has been for Blacks. Even with the progress made over the past 45 years, in 2015 metropolitan Washington still had 43 census tracts within D.C. (all east of the Anacostia) and 35 in Prince George’s County that were more than 90 percent Black.

Metropolitan Washington had zero census tracts that were more than 90 percent Hispanic. The region did have 36 census tracts that were majority Hispanic residents – 13 in Prince George’s County, 10 in Montgomery County, but none in DC itself. The average proportion of Hispanics in majority Hispanic tracts was 61 percent.

The National Picture

How do Metropolitan Washington’s trends regarding Hispanic segregation compare with other large metro areas?  This table  divides 49 metro areas of more than 1 million residents into six categories (A to F) : first, by the percentage of Hispanics they had in 1980, then, by their percentage growth in Hispanic population between 1980 and 2010.

While everyone would agree that growth rates of 1,125 percent to 3,723 percent represents “explosive growth,” it’s doubtless hard to accept that a growth rate of 265 percent (that is, almost quadrupling) should be characterized as “modest growth” yet that’s the relative reality of Hispanic population dynamics over these three decades.

Note that the category A (less than 5 percent Hispanic/explosive growth) metro areas—there are six of them, and most are in the south–saw their Hispanic/Anglo segregation indices leap upward, on average, from 26.3 to 44.9 – an 18.7 point increase.   The twenty category B metro areas (with less than 5 percent Hispanic/rapid growth) also, on average, saw significant increases in Hispanic segregation indices from 33.8 to 42.9 – and this is the category into which Metropolitan Washington falls.

At the other end of the spectrum, the three category F metro areas (more than 20 percent Hispanic/modest growth) saw an overall reduction in Hispanic segregation indices from 55.8 to 51.8. In fact, setting aside Las Vegas NV (a national outlier in almost every demographic metric), the other categories which were either Rust Belt/slow job growth metro areas (category C) or which had more appreciable, established Hispanic populations in 1980 (categories D, E and, as noted, F) effectively average relatively stable or declining Hispanic segregation indices.

Temporary “Ponding” or Permanent Barrios?

Does the increase in Hispanic segregation in regions with explosive or rapid Hispanic growth (either through immigration from abroad or internal migration from other areas of the USA) represent just a temporary “ponding together” of newcomers for mutual aid and support of relatives, friends and ethnic societies and churches as has occurred historically with other immigrant groups? With time and greater demographic stability will Hispanics scatter out into a wider range of more diverse neighborhoods? Or does this increase presage the creation of permanent, highly isolated, largely low income Hispanic barrios akin to Black ghettoes?

The data do not provide a clear answer yet.

But my experience of Albuquerque offers hope.   Metro Albuquerque’s population was 36 percent Hispanic in 1980 and, with its Hispanic population growing to 47 percent in 2010, still saw a steady decrease in Hispanic segregation indices from 45.0 in 1980 to 36.4 in 2010.

In text note:

[metro] The Washington DC-MD-VA metro area in 1971 was composed of the District of Columbia; Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland; and Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William counties and the cities in Alexandria, Fairfax and Falls Church in Virginia.

This post has been updated to fix minor grammar mistakes. 

 

Feature photo by Ted Eytan (source).


David Rusk is a Senior Fellow at the D.C. Policy Center. Rusk is a former federal Labor Department official, New Mexico legislator, and mayor of Albuquerque, the USA’s 32nd largest city. He is also the author of Cities without Suburbs. Now a consultant on urban policy, Rusk has worked in over 130 US communities in 35 states.  Abroad, Rusk has lectured on urban problems in Canada, England, Germany, South Africa, and The Netherlands. 

Table of Metropolitan Area Groupings used in this study

Metro Category % growth                in Hispanics          1980-2010 Average Hispanic segregation index               in 1980 Average Hispanic segregation index               in 2010 Average change in Hispanic segregation index           1980-2010
Group A. less than 5% Hispanic; explosive growth 1125% to 3723% 26.3 44.9 18.7
  1. Raleigh NC
  2. Charlotte NC-SC
  3. Atlanta GA
  4. Orlando FL
  5. Nashville TN
  6. Indianapolis IN
Group B. less than 5% Hispanic; rapid growth 330% to 988% 33.8 42.9 9.2
  1. Fort Lauderdale FL
  2. Portland OR-WA
  3. Louisville KY-IN
  4.  West Palm Beach FL
  5. Richmond VA
  6. Birmingham AL
  7. Columbus OH
  8. WASHINGTON DC-VA-MS-WV
  9. Minneapolis-St Paul MN-WI
  10. Oklahoma City OK
  11. Memphis TN-AR-MS
  12. Seattle WA
  13. Jacksonville FL
  14. Cincinnati OJ-KY-IN
  15. Baltimore MD
  16. Providence RI-MA
  17. Kansas City MO-KS
  18. Norfolk-Newport News VA-NC
  19. Boston MA-NH;
  20. Milwaukee WI
Group C. less than 5% Hispanic; modest growth 84% to 265% 47.8 46.0 -1.8
  1. Camden NJ
  2. Philadelphia PA
  3. Hartford CT
  4. Rochester NY
  5. St Louis MO-IL
  6. Buffalo NY
  7. Cleveland OH
  8. Pittsburgh PA
  9. Detroit MI
  10. New Orleans LA
Group D. 5% to 10% Hispanic; modest/rapid growth (without Las Vegas) 193% to 1521% (193% to 629%) 47.6  (50.8) 48.5  (49.3) 0.9.     (-1.5)
  1. Las Vegas NV
  2. Fort Worth TX
  3. Dallas TX
  4. Tampa-St Petersburg FL
  5. Salt Lake City UT
  6. Sacramento CA
  7. Paterson NJ
  8. Chicago IL
  9. Newark NJ
Group E. 10% to 20% Hispanic; modest/rapid growth 78% to 589% 46.2 49.9 3.7
  1. Riverside-San Bernardino CA
  2. Austin TX
  3. Houston TX
  4. San Diego CA
  5. Anaheim CA
  6. Denver CO
  7. Oakland CA
  8. San Jose CA
  9. San Francisco CA
  10. New York NY
Group F. more than 20% Hispanic; modest growth 127% to 180% 55.8 51.8 -3.9
  1. Miami FL
  2. San Antonio TX
  3. Los Angeles CA
Table Note: Segregation index: scale 0 to 100 (100 = total apartheid); lower numbers represent improvement

 

 

D.C. Policy Center Fellows are independent writers, and we gladly encourage the expression of a variety of perspectives. The views of our Fellows, published here or elsewhere, does not reflect the views of the D.C. Policy Center.

You might also be interested in…