Policy Center in your inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

D.C. is often referred to as a city where a car-free lifestyle is a distinct possibility. The real estate service Redfin recently rated D.C. as the fourth best U.S. city to live in without a car. Several organized citywide initiatives, such as Car-free Day and Bike to Work Day, promote car-free commutes. The D.C. Council is also considering a bill that would require employers to offer transit benefits or cash in lieu of parking subsidies.

A car-free lifestyle in D.C. has many benefits, both for the individual and for the city. It can lower household commuting costs and promote a healthy lifestyle. It can reduce citywide traffic congestion, increase accessibility for businesses, and help the city meet its goals in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, for some residents, getting around the city without a car may be easier said than done.

 

The Car-Free Livability Index

To assess the ease of switching to a car-free lifestyle, I’ve developed a Car-Free Livability Index—a simple scale that shows whether or not a D.C. neighborhood supports a car-free lifestyle. The index incorporates relative walk-ability, bike-ability, and public transit scores using data from Walk Score, as well as average availability of private transit services such as Car2Go and taxicabs. (For more details about how the Index was created, see the “About the data” section at the end of this piece.)

Car free livability index for DC

The map above illustrates the range in car-free livability values throughout D.C., with higher scores showing areas that are likely relatively easier to live in without a car. Scores are highest in central areas such as Chinatown (96), Dupont Circle (93), and Logan Circle (92), where the abundance and density of public transit and on-demand rental options make it relatively easy to live and work without owning a car. At the ward level, residents are much more likely to walk or bike to work in these areas, with an average commute time of 24 minutes for residents living in Ward 2 (compared with 31 minutes for the entire city).

Meanwhile, the lowest scores are concentrated in neighborhoods to the south and east, specifically in neighborhoods such as Kenilworth (29.1), Burrville (29.5), and Benning Ridge (29.6). However, at the ward level, residents in Wards 7 and 8 are still only somewhat more likely to drive to work than take public transit, and face average commute times of 35-36 minutes. While “car-free” implies a positive decision to live without a car, the lack of reliable transportation alternatives in these areas means the absence of a car can compound other hardships, potentially lengthening residents’ commutes and reducing access to grocery stores and other amenities.

 

The demographics of car-free living

As the Car-Free Livability Index map suggests, “car-free living” isn’t always a lifestyle choice. Due to the landscape of racial and socioeconomic divides that persist in the city, many D.C. residents are forced to live car-free because of circumstances beyond their control despite also lacking sufficient and reliable access to other transportation options.

 

Median income

A look at median household incomes across the car-free livability index confirms that households with lower median incomes tend to live in areas where car-free living is less supportable. In fact, median incomes among residents in mid- to high-score areas (60 to 100) are more than double those of residents in low-score areas (20 to 40).

 

Income and car-free livability

 

The disparity in scores is manifest during periods of severe weather and interruptions to public transportation, like WMATA’s SafeTrack, for example. When these interruptions hit, private transit and on-demand services are theoretically an option, but may not be economically sustainable for many low-income households.

 

Household size

Household size can also add stress to car-free households. Children in a family may attend multiple schools across the city, and adult family members may head in opposite directions for work, education, or training; the amount of planning, forethought, and reliance on local infrastructure can be overwhelming.

The data reveals that larger households that don’t have a car are more likely to live in areas with lower car-free livability scores, while smaller car-free households are more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher car-free livability scores. This could be related to the small stock of multi-bedroom housing in D.C., as larger rental and condo options are in limited supply in areas that are easy to live in without a car. The result of these findings suggests that larger families are often pushed to areas with lower car-free livability scores in search of appropriate housing.

 

Car-free livability by household size

 

Race and ethnicity

As suggested by the car-free living index map, neighborhoods with low proportion of white residents are disproportionately likely to have low car-free livability scores. The chart below shows a clear trend that as car-free livability index scores rise, the percentage of black residents in those areas decreases (and the percentage of white residents increases). Due to sample size limitations, it is not possible to display data for Hispanic and Asian residents.

 

Car-free livability for areas by neighborhood race/ethnicity proportions

Conclusion: Car-free living starts with car-free infrastructure

There is an obvious disparity in car-free infrastructure throughout the city. While it makes sense that the economic heart of the city should also be an area where a car-free lifestyle is easily achieved, the focus needs now to be an investment in car-free infrastructures in neighborhoods which low car-free live-ability scores. This includes improving bus routes and metro service, as well as improving sidewalks, increasing mileage of bike lanes, and improving access to low-cost bike rentals.

While some of these changes can be relatively simple, the relative lack of reliable public transit options seems the largest hurdle to improving the lives of many of the cities car-free residents (whether they are car-free by choice or not). The rollback of Metro’s off-peak hours and other service cuts are likely to decrease the feasibility of living without a car and add to current economic stresses already faced by communities with the lowest car-free livability scores.

 

About the data: How the Car-Free Livability Index was created

The Car-Free Livability Index is a simple scale that shows whether or not a D.C. neighborhood supports a car-free lifestyle. The index incorporates relative walk-ability, bike-ability, and public transit scores using data from, as well as average availability of private transit services such as Car2Go and taxicabs and presence of bikeshare stations:

Deciding the exact weighting of each of these factors was based on a survey of literature indicating the importance of various factors in creating car-free cities (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3), but in the end creating such an index involves a certain level of subjectivity. Also, some factors will matter more to some residents than others, based on personal circumstances and general preferences; however, together these factors combine to serve as a starting point for a discussion about car-free livability in the District of Columbia.

Other data sources

Demographic data was derived from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (2015) and retrieved via the U.S. Census Bureau’s API service. Individual variable IDs can be found on lines 26 – 41 in the analysis code:

Code

The code for all the analysis and visuals in the piece is available on my Github.

 


D.C. Policy Center Senior Fellow Randy Smith is a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Specialist, and has an MSc in Geospatial and Mapping Science from the University of Glasgow. He has a passion for maps, baking, and running. He lives in Tenleytown with his wife. For more about his current projects, visit  www.rhsmithjr.com.

D.C. Policy Center Fellows are independent writers, and we gladly encourage the expression of a variety of perspectives. The views of our Fellows, published here or elsewhere, does not reflect the views of the D.C. Policy Center.

  • jwcbkdc

    Interesting work, but I think there’s more at play here. Since the Walk Score is a major part of the index, the issue isn’t just ‘car-free infrastructure.’ Walk Score’s proprietary methodology is heavily focused on what “amenities” (as identified by them) can be accessed on foot. According to their website, there are scores for “Grocery,” “Errands,” “Park,” “Culture,” “School,” “Dining and Drinking,” “Shopping.” Without getting into the fraught question of whether WalkScore’s algorithm reflects how diverse communities value different neighborhood amenities (do churches score higher than nightclubs or vice-versa? Does a NPS traffic median count the same as a playground or rec center?), it’s important to note the inherent biases of that data source. Job Access, healthcare access, senior services — these aren’t addressed. Many neighborhoods have a low score because of limited retail; other areas may seem more ‘car-free friendly’ simply because there are more shops. The farthest transit-deficient reaches of Spring Valley appear to score the same as or better than every Metro station and retail hub East of the River. Does the higher-end retail mix around Wagshal’s/Crate & Barrel really make it more walkable than the area around the Big Chair in Anacostia?

  • Ann Eichenberger

    While this article is somewhat insightful, the map needs to improve by labeling neighborhoods by their commonly-known name or by their zip code + plus 4. Another way to improve would be to add grocery stores. That addition would highlight the lack of food stores in many areas.

  • joe

    This piece, while interesting, is lacking in a few ways. The methodology does not take into account the access to jobs or other destinations in a serious way, aside from piggy-backing on WalkScore’s methodology. If a person lives in an area with only one transit line, but that transit line efficiently gets them to their job and other destinations, then they really don’t need a car. This methodology doesn’t reflect that very well.

  • war_on_hugs

    I would love to see a map of Metrorail and major bus lines superimposed on a map like this. I suspect that part of the issue for neighborhoods EOTR is the lack of frequent, direct bus service to major job and activity centers. While far from perfect, “express” services offered on 16th and 14th Streets NW are a major boon, especially at peak times.

    Of course, it’s a conundrum since these neighborhoods also have relatively high proportions of people who are car-free (by choice or otherwise), are older, and may have mobility issues. So eliminating stops and straightening routes would likely engender a lot of pushback.

  • Sidney Rock Dove

    Beautiful charts and maps.

    Main shortcoming is that it fails to take into account how dreadful crossing intersections can be in parts of downtown with sociopathic drivers.

You might also be interested in…